oh really …

I TOOK A MOST EXCELLENT CLASS AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY’S SUMMER  SESSION LAST YEAR: STATS 202 “DATA MINING AND ANALYSIS” TAUGHT BY A GOOGLE GUY.

SO I WAS SLIGHTLY CONFUSED WHEN I WAS SCROLLING THROUGH G-NEWS TO AN ARTICLE FROM THE REGISTER THAT SCHMIDT TELLS COLBERT THAT GOOGLE DOESN’T DATA MINE.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/22/googles-eric-schmidt-faces-off-with-stephen-colbert/

SPECIFICALLY IN THE ARTICLE THE G-CEO SAID: “We actually don’t do data mining,” Schmidt said. “Our computers go out and they find out everything going on on the web and they figure out what points to each other and that gives us the algorithm, which is called PageRank. And that’s how we decide how to rank the results.”

Google Research head Peter Norvig says PageRank isn’t really that important. But that’s another matter.

AND IN THE CLASS BESIDES LEARNING R, THE MOST EXCELLENT INSTRUCTOR POINTED TO DATA MINING TWITTER PROJECTS.

I’M NOT SURE OF THE PRIVACY ISSUES BUT CHECK OUT STATS202.COM TAUGHT AT G-CAMPUS FOR A SET OF LECTURES TAUGHT PREVIOUSLY BY MY INSTRUCTOR’S COLLEAGUE AND THE CLASS DEMAND WENT UP IN PRICE TO $3500, 2010 FROM APPROX. $2200, 2009

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s